Horst BP to BP - all data exported. MD2 to BP - all data exported. MD3 to BP - all progress notes, pathology etc. are exported. Recalls were not exported - I don't see this a such a crime, especially knowing that this can happen with no government funding & no big stick approach to the software developer. All you do for Recalls is print them out, scan that document into patient record before sending the record to new GP - thus the "trail" still works
Cedric -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Horst Herb Sent: Sunday, 1 April 2007 1:07 PM To: General Practice Computing Group Talk Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] backup! - FOSS databases vs entrenched solutions On Friday 30 March 2007 09:37, Cedric Meyerowitz wrote: > So in Australia if a patient moves from BP practice to BP practice - > we are okay, if from MD2 to BP and a few others, then we are better > than the UK as coversions from MD2 to a few software packages already > exist(in UK currently only has 2 systems involved). And if patient > moves from MD3 to BP we are also okay - and this is without government > funding. Yet this list got rather excited about the UK development, > forgetting that here down under things are not so bad. > So you think that the ability to export *most* (?) of a patient's record between a couple of proprietary programs in a tedious way in a one way only fashion is "not so bad" ??? Suggest get your Lithium levels checked. Horst _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
