The whole point of DVA is to be different - otherwise what would all
those public servants do?
We would all be better off without DVA in any case. Now there is a
political action we could take - we can all do without DVA patients I
expect - or at least bulk bill them under Medi*are. Refuse to sign an
LMO agreement when it next comes up (or terminate the contract) and get
rid of all the crap. It is the only thing that they will understand. The
Veterans can still be treated for free. It would cost relatively little,
and would be an effective victory against all the bureaucrats - then
move on to other things
R
Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Sunday 15 April 2007 19:24, Simon James wrote:
5. What about DVA?
A. DVA claims will not be transmitted using Medicare Easyclaim. These
claims require an additional set of information which would not be
efficient to transmit using EFTPOS, nor to enter into a terminal. These
claims can be processed as they are today, including through Medicare's
online channel.
Brilliant work!
Now my DVA work (personal) comes to about 5% of my billings. So I can have
a 'wonderful' new system which doesn't work for a significant proportion of
my business?
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
