[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd propose a `halfway-house' model: Kuang can release DOCLE under the GPL > with a > patent grant for use under the GPL licence only. This allows it to be studied, > and provides the guarantee of continuity of the codebase in the unstable > commerical world, but this code can't be included in HealthLink/MD3/etc.: they > need to negotiate directly with Kuang and cut cheques as before.
Yes, that would be perfectly satisfactory. But that idea has been put to Kuang before and silence was the only reply. I'm sure no-one minds Kuang posting on this list and elsewhere regarding DOCLE (I certainly don't), but I also hope that no-one minds me reminding everyone on each such occasions of DOCLE's entirely proprietary, patented nature. Tim C _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
