I think this view does not take account of the mechanism for providing
SCT nor the need to support it in further development.
Someone has to pay to maintain it and develop it to a useful point. In
OZ the government has decided to absorb that cost and provide it free to
vendors and users. SCT has a potential to make a difference. If
physicians take Horst's position it will not advance and its potential
will be lost - that will truly make it a waste of money.
jon
Horst Herb wrote:
On Wednesday 02 May 2007, Ian Cheong wrote:
See:
http://www.ihtsdo.org/
Sadly, this has not changed the silly counterproductive status quo:
http://www.ihtsdo.org/about-us/faq/#c528
So, for the time being, I could not care less.
Horst
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
--
Jon Patrick
Chair of Language Technologies +61-2-9351 3524
School of Information Technology
Faculty of Engineering & IT
University of Sydney
begin:vcard
fn:Jon Patrick
n:Patrick;Jon
org:Faculty of Engineering;School of Information Technologies
adr;dom:;;University of Sydney
title:Chair of Language Technology
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.it.usyd.edu.au/~jonpat
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
