> Tim Churches wrote:
> > 
> > I'm at an open-source in health conference in Kuala Lumpur 
> right now 
> > and have seen MIRTH in action and have to say it is the ant's pants 
> > and can handle both of the above with ease and elegance. All free, 
> > open-source, well supported (by the vendor in the US, but it's well 
> > written open-source so no reason why it can't be supported 
> locally if 
> > a support company wanted to pick it up), and they have a nifty 
> > "appliance" version the size of a hardback novel which just 
> plugs in 
> > to your network, draws about 5 watts of power and handles all 
> > messaging.  See http://www.mirthproject.org
> 
> Hi Tim,
> 
> I have had a play with MIRTH as well and its quite good. 
> Medical-Objects can interoperate with Mirth and we have been 
> in touch with the developers to try and standardise GELLO a 
> bit as we have both written a GELLO compiler.
> 
> Its fine to connect 2 sites and does have interface engine 
> abilities, as they realize its needed as well. However any 
> PKI setup of addressing is quite manual, or at least it was 
> previously. In many ways it similar to Kestrals HL7Connect, 
> which we also interoperate with.
> 
> Having a centrally maintained online directory and key store 
> makes setting up new end points easy and I think thats whats 
> lacking from Mirth at the moment, although I have not looked 
> at it for a few months.
> 
> Andrew McIntyre
> _______________________________________________
> Gpcg_talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

---------

Hi Andrew,

Interesting development regarding GELLO; is it not however dependent on
the clinical concepts being appropriately defined and constructed? Are
we (Aust HI) there yet?

Additionally within the use context of GELLO above, are you middleware
mapping between MIRTH and other clinical software packages? 

Curious!!

Andre.

PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential.  It 
is intended solely for the addressee.  If you receive this e-mail by mistake 
please notify us ASAP, and then delete this email (and any attachments).  We 
apologise for any inconvenience this may cause.  Any views expressed in this 
message are solely those of the individual sender, except where the sender 
specifically states them to be the views of the Adelaide Western General 
Practice Network. 

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to