Craig you reminded me of something else you can run on profile... Matt Davies once told me he used a modified version of Profile to record his Profile client visits and details. So you can run an I.T. support business on it :)
Andrew.C -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Barnett Sent: Thursday, 17 May 2007 12:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [GPCG_TALK] RE: Gpcg_talk Digest, Vol 20, Issue 41 Craig B in Newcastle NSW We are mostly happy profile users 30 gig db running MS SQL version , sbs 2003, 8 consulting rooms, 1 dual nurse treatment room, we would be "fully paperless" but for the lack of agreed stds for electronically moving referrals and inbound specialist letters It effortlessly handles about 400 tasks per day (no sticky notes!!) , 160 pg of scanning and about 500 recall letters a month, 25 on site terminals, up to 15 off site terminal service links in for Drs working from home etc I regularly send suggestions or complaints about issues to Intrahealth and get a good response rate. I try to be positive and constructive in looking at "ISSUES" (mind you we are a bit strange in that "I" am first level help so we as an in house rule try not to pester Intrahealth help desk unless we have double checked it is a real issue and not just a user preference or user inexperience issue) The software seems limitless in its potential to be manipulated to specific in house needs - so like writing a letter in MS Word we are not bound to someone else's view of what the letter should or should not look like. Like all software it has its down sides - happy to discuss these I think the key issue or "word of warning" for using profile is understanding it is not "out of the box" It is a very open platform for YOU to determine how it will be used in your business. I jokingly and seriously say to people I could run the Ancorr hotel group or A whole hospital or a general practice with profile - it will flexibly adapt to all these environments. Craig Barnett King Street General Practice - Newcastle -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 17 May 2007 12:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Gpcg_talk Digest, Vol 20, Issue 41 Send Gpcg_talk mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Gpcg_talk digest..." Today's Topics: 1. RE: Profile (Bill Walton) 2. Re: MS SQL 2000 purchase options. (David Guest) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:55:03 +1000 From: "Bill Walton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [GPCG_TALK] Profile To: "'General Practice Computing Group Talk'" <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" I am just after information from other users........... -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Terry Sent: Thursday, 17 May 2007 11:11 AM To: General Practice Computing Group Talk Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Profile On Thursday 17 May 2007 08:53, Bill Walton wrote: > Any unhappy Profile users out there ? Are we to imply you are unhappy? Richard > Dr Bill Walton FRACGP DTM(Glas) > Wodonga West Medical Clinic > 195 Melbourne Rd > Wodonga VIC 3690 _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:59:13 +1000 From: David Guest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] MS SQL 2000 purchase options. To: General Practice Computing Group Talk <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Greg Twyford wrote: > Ahh, a virtual community of the few, blocked I'm sure by many > governments, almost certainly the Chinese, and I'm sure many others, > and, of course, inaccessible to large parts of the third world. > > But great for us privileged few wanting some alternate sources of > information. > > but I wonder how much it's monitored and has the potential to be > perverted by the likes of the CIA, the religious right, etc? > > Greg At least the MPAA can't get you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AACS_encryption_key_controversy David ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk End of Gpcg_talk Digest, Vol 20, Issue 41 ***************************************** _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
