Hi Asgeir, >From memory, you need to have the data disks going in as a separate storage >pool to have the split block size - so metadata disks in the "system" pool and >data disks in , say, the "data" pool. Have you got that split here?
---- Orlando Sent from my phone > On 11 Feb 2014, at 17:23, Asgeir Storesund Nilsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I want to create a file system with 16MB for data blocks and 256k for > metadata blocks. Under filesystem version 13.01 (3.5.0.0) this worked just > fine, even when upgrading GPFS later. > > However, for a filesystem created with version 13.23 (3.5.0.7), if I specify > both data and metadata block sizes, the metadata block size applies for both. > If I do not specify metadata block size, the data block size (-B) is used > for both. > > This has a detrimental impact on our metadataOnly NSDs, as they fill up > pretty quickly. > > > Are any of you aware of updates / bugs in GPFS that might help explain and > alleviate this issue? Any hints would be appreciated. > > Regards, > Asgeir > _______________________________________________ > gpfsug-discuss mailing list > gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org > http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
