There is a general system administration idiom that states you should avoid 
mounting file systems at the root directory (e.g. /) to avoid any problems with 
response to administrative commands in the root directory (e.g. ls, stat, etc) 
if there is a file system issue that would cause these commands to hang.

Beyond that the directory and file system naming scheme is really dependent on 
how your organization wants to manage the environment.  Hope that helps,
-Bryan

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stuart Barkley
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 12:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] filesets and mountpoint naming

Resent: First copy sent Sept 23.  Maybe stuck in a moderation queue?

When we first started using GPFS we created several filesystems and just 
directly mounted them where seemed appropriate.  We have something like:

    /home
    /scratch
    /projects
    /reference
    /applications

We are finding the overhead of separate filesystems to be troublesome and are 
looking at using filesets inside fewer filesystems to accomplish our goals (we 
will probably keep /home separate for now).

We can put symbolic links in place to provide the same user experience, but I'm 
looking for suggestions as to where to mount the actual gpfs filesystems.

We have multiple compute clusters with multiple gpfs systems, one cluster has a 
traditional gpfs system and a separate gss system which will obviously need 
multiple mount points.  We also want to consider possible future cross cluster 
mounts.

Some thoughts are to just do filesystems as:

    /gpfs01, /gpfs02, etc.
    /mnt/gpfs01, etc
    /mnt/clustera/gpfs01, etc.

What have other people done?  Are you happy with it?  What would you do 
differently?

Thanks,
Stuart
--
I've never been lost; I was once bewildered for three days, but never lost!
                                        --  Daniel Boone 
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

________________________________

Note: This email is for the confidential use of the named addressee(s) only and 
may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination 
or copying of this email is strictly prohibited, and to please notify the 
sender immediately and destroy this email and any attachments. Email 
transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The Company, 
therefore, does not make any guarantees as to the completeness or accuracy of 
this email or any attachments. This email is for informational purposes only 
and does not constitute a recommendation, offer, request or solicitation of any 
kind to buy, sell, subscribe, redeem or perform any type of transaction of a 
financial product.
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to