The issues that I see with the meeting at the SC conferences are: 1) It's usually only scheduled for a 2-3 hour time slot, which is not adequate time for a proper meeting like we have in the UK, which will likely expand to two full days! 2) It usually conflicts with so many other sessions, "user group" meetings, birds of a feather, Intel or other company training/presentations, or my own company outings and more. Last SC I had to choose between the DDN and GPFS "User Group" meetings. You can't be in all places at the same time!
Perhaps we could still hold a US based GPFS User Group Meeting at SC'15 in Austin, but I would still want two days for the meeting either before or after the event... that would mean it would require days on the weekend before or after the conference. Look forward to hearing other member's thoughts, -Bryan -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Zachary Giles Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 11:22 AM To: gpfsug main discussion list Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS UG USA I would go! On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services) <[email protected]> wrote: > > The format of th sc meeting was similar to that of the UK group with a mix of > customer and ibm presentations. Though I guess as it coincides with SC, the > customers there will mostly be HPC related customers where as gpfs ug is > supposed to be a mix of industries. > > I think there were also more techies from IBM at the UK meeting than the sc > meeting. I know they need to find a bigger space and more time in Austin! > > Simon > .________________________________________ > From: [email protected] > [[email protected]] on behalf of Bryan Banister > [[email protected]] > Sent: 28 May 2015 16:12 > To: gpfsug main discussion list > Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS UG USA > > Hi Ed, > > > > The meeting at the SC conference was organized and led by IBM. The GPFS User > Group meetings in England and the other events sponsored by this organization > are created and led by customers of IBM. We are hoping to start holding > similar events in the US, like the meet-the-devs outings and meetings with > probably two days of presentations and discussions from GPFS Customers and > the IBM GPFS Developers. > > > > It’s a great way to meet others that are deploying similar solutions and > provide IBM direct feedback on their latest GPFS developments! > > -Bryan > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeno Cram > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:08 AM > To: gpfsug main discussion list > Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS UG USA > > Count me in as well. > > Thanks, > Jeno > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Wahl, Edward > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Does our meeting @SC not count? Either way, count me in please. > > Ed Wahl > OSC > > ________________________________________ > From: > [email protected]<mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces@gpfsug > .org> > [[email protected]<mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces@gpfsu > g.org>] on behalf of Jez Tucker (Chair) > [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 9:32 AM > To: gpfsug main discussion list > Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS UG USA > > Hello > > Last one today... > > Several of you approached me at the UG regarding setting up GPFS UG > representation state-side. > Please drop us an email through and we'll look at that with you. > > Many thanks > > Jez > _______________________________________________ > gpfsug-discuss mailing list > gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org<http://gpfsug.org> > http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss > _______________________________________________ > gpfsug-discuss mailing list > gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org<http://gpfsug.org> > http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss > > > ________________________________ > > Note: This email is for the confidential use of the named addressee(s) only > and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you > are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, > dissemination or copying of this email is strictly prohibited, and to please > notify the sender immediately and destroy this email and any attachments. > Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The > Company, therefore, does not make any guarantees as to the completeness or > accuracy of this email or any attachments. This email is for informational > purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation, offer, request or > solicitation of any kind to buy, sell, subscribe, redeem or perform any type > of transaction of a financial product. > _______________________________________________ > gpfsug-discuss mailing list > gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org > http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss -- Zach Giles [email protected] _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss ________________________________ Note: This email is for the confidential use of the named addressee(s) only and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email is strictly prohibited, and to please notify the sender immediately and destroy this email and any attachments. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The Company, therefore, does not make any guarantees as to the completeness or accuracy of this email or any attachments. This email is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation, offer, request or solicitation of any kind to buy, sell, subscribe, redeem or perform any type of transaction of a financial product. _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
