They seem to have killed dead the idea of just moving the software side of that 
by itself, wayyy.... back now.   late 2013?/early 2014   Even though the 
components are fairly standard units(Engenio before, not sure now).

Ironic as GPFS/Spectrum Scale is storage software...   Even more ironic for our 
site as we have the Controller based units these JBODs are from for our 
metadata and one of our many storage pools. (DDN on others)

Ed


________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on 
behalf of Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services) 
[[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 9:56 AM
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Disabling individual Storage Pools by themselves? 
How about GPFS Native Raid?

Er. Everytime I’ve ever asked about GNR,, the response has been that its only 
available as packaged products as it has to understand things like the shelf 
controllers, disk drives etc, in order for things like the disk hospital to 
work. (And the last time I asked talked about GNR was in May at the User group).

So under (3), I’m posting here asking if anyone from IBM knows anything 
different?

Thanks

Simon

From: Marc A Kaplan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: gpfsug main discussion list 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, 19 June 2015 14:51
To: gpfsug main discussion list 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Disabling individual Storage Pools by themselves? 
How about GPFS Native Raid?

2. I don't know the details of the packaged products, but I believe you can 
license the software and configure huge installations,
comprising as many racks of disks, and associated hardware as you desire or 
need.  The software was originally designed to be used
in the huge HPC computing laboratories of certain governmental and 
quasi-governmental institutions.
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to