On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 10:43 -0400, Marc A Kaplan wrote: > On GPFS-Linux-Redhat commands getfacl and setfacl DO seem to work > fine for me. >
Yes they do, but they only set POSIX ACL's, and well most people are wanting to set NFSv4 ACL's so the getfacl and setfacl commands are of no use. > nfs4_getfacl and nfs4_setfacl ... NOT so much ... actually, today > not at all, at least not for me ;-( Yep they only work against an NFSv4 mounted file system with NFSv4 ACL's. So if you NFSv4 exported a GPFS file system from an AIX node and mounted it on a Linux node that would work for you. It might also work if you NFSv4 exported a GPFS file system using the userspace ganesha NFS server with an appropriate VFS backend for GPFS and mounted on Linux https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha However last time I checked such a GPFS VFS backend for ganesha was still under development. The RichACL stuff might also in theory work except it is not in mainline kernels and there is certainly no advertised support by IBM for GPFS using it. JAB. -- Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk Fife, United Kingdom. _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
