So the 5.1.3+ implementation uses the values in the SMB registry for "valid user", "host allow", "Host deny" If we have force user/group set, via net config, will it just pick that up?
Kindest regards, Paul Paul Ward TS Infrastructure Architect Natural History Museum T: 02079426450 E: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: gpfsug-discuss <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Christof Schmitt Sent: 26 September 2022 15:27 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Supported samba options On Mon, 2022-09-26 at 10:02 +0000, Paul Ward wrote: > I can't find any permutation of computer name that works. If there is a problem, maybe best to track this through a support ticket. > If we upgrade to 5.1.3, where we are "valid user", "host allow", "Host > deny" via the net config command, do you have any idea what will > happen to these values? The config database where these are set will be kept. So not additional steps should be required. Regards, Christof _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgpfsug.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fgpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org&data=05%7C01%7Cp.ward%40nhm.ac.uk%7C9269b4f81b3f4dd01c5108da9fcbd02d%7C73a29c014e78437fa0d4c8553e1960c1%7C1%7C0%7C637997994965821459%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=QhnJoFdlK9WU9WiM62joq2rC57%2FzK2EBa%2BWUFnI45wc%3D&reserved=0 _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org
