We looked into it, but couldn’t afford the licenses. As it stands now, our 
“standard” licenses (or the Lenovo equivalent — data management, or data 
access? I forget) are apparently about to double in price. Glad to hear that if 
something changed in that area, it works well.

On May 23, 2023, at 17:23, Alec <[email protected]> wrote:

For those who don't use GPFS encryption.  I can say the GPFS version is 
fantastic.  Our write performance was nominally faster due to the compression 
of encryption I suppose. But it works flawlessly and at speed.

Alec

On Tue, May 23, 2023, 4:51 PM Ryan Novosielski 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thanks!

We don’t use encryption, which is I suppose why I was unfamiliar. Happy to vote 
for it though.

On May 23, 2023, at 16:31, Alec <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:

For GPFS encryption we use an IBM SKLM (Key Server) and it uses SSL 
certificates for that communication.  The SKLM server needs to provide / use 
TLS 1.3 SSL to pass our security standards but GPFS doesn't state it will 
support that.

Alec

On Tue, May 23, 2023, 3:25 PM Ryan Novosielski 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
There’s very little detail there. Can you elaborate on what this is actually 
for/where it is used in GPFS?

--
#BlackLivesMatter
____
|| \\UTGERS,    |---------------------------*O*---------------------------
||_// the State  |         Ryan Novosielski - 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
|| \\ University | Sr. Technologist - 973/972.0922 (2x0922) ~*~ RBHS Campus
||  \\    of NJ  | Office of Advanced Research Computing - MSB A555B, Newark
     `'

On May 22, 2023, at 23:16, Alec <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:

Hello we are being asked to support TLS 1.3 in our configuration.

Can I ask that folks upvote this RFE to help get it addressed?


https://ibm-sys-storage.ideas.ibm.com/ideas/GPFS-I-964

Alec
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org<http://gpfsug.org/>
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org

_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org<http://gpfsug.org/>
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org<http://gpfsug.org/>
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org

_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org<http://gpfsug.org/>
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org

_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org

Reply via email to