Hello, I find this information very interesting: > In The Upcoming Scale Release there will be a CES-S3 (Baremetal) Version of > these s3-Endpoints. And this is promissing already for us.
any ideas when that release will be available? I heard something about Q1/2 2024, and I am truly looking forward for some serious S3 on gpfs solution. Best regards, Patryk Belzak. HPC sysadmin, Wroclaw Centre for Networking and Supercomputing. On 24/02/29 06:46AM, Andi Nør Christiansen wrote: > MinIO is not supported on GPFS, just an fyi. Had a long discussion with > them about that as we also had CES S3 that we wanted to move away from. > > We went in the same direction as Renar. > > Best Regards > > Andi Nør Christiansen > IT Solution Specialist > > Mobile +45 23 89 59 75 > E-mail [email protected] > Web www.b4restore.com > > [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] > > -----Original Message----- > From: gpfsug-discuss <[email protected]> On Behalf Of > Stephan Graf > Sent: 28. februar 2024 18:02 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-scale-object > > Hi Christoph, > > we are running CES-Object in production and are facing the same issue that > this solution is deprecated. Our security division sending us scan reports > that the server are running an python version which is not in support any > more (and we should upgrade). > So we are looking for another solution which looks to be minIO (on top of > a scale file system). > > Stephan > > On 2/28/24 17:37, Grunenberg, Renar wrote: > > Hallo Daniel, Christoph, > > currently IBM make a not good job on that, but it's light on that topic. > > Currently you can use Swift/s3 on 5.1.9.1 with a backlevel scale (swift) > version. But i don't recommend this. > > Since 5.1.3.1 you can use IBM Spectrum Scale DAS S3 -Service > > (containerized s3 endpoints on noobaa-based operator called Openshift > Data Foundation) But this will be after 5.1.9.1 DAS also deprecated. (We > use this Version today). > > In The Upcoming Scale Release there will be a CES-S3 (Baremetal) Version > of these s3-Endpoints. And this is promissing already for us. > > > > > > > > Renar Grunenberg > > Abteilung Informatik - Betrieb > > > > HUK-COBURG > > Bahnhofsplatz > > 96444 Coburg > > Telefon: 09561 96-44110 > > Telefax: 09561 96-44104 > > E-Mail: [email protected] > > Internet: www.huk.de > > ====================================================================== > > = HUK-COBURG Haftpflicht-Unterstützungs-Kasse kraftfahrender Beamter > > Deutschlands a. G. in Coburg Reg.-Gericht Coburg HRB 100; St.-Nr. > > 9212/101/00021 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bahnhofsplatz, 96444 Coburg > > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. Heinrich R. Schradin. > > Vorstand: Klaus-Jürgen Heitmann (Sprecher), Stefan Gronbach, Dr. Hans > Olav Herøy, Dr. Helen Reck, Dr. Jörg Rheinländer, Thomas Sehn, Daniel > Thomas. > > ====================================================================== > > = Diese Nachricht enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte > > Informationen. > > Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese Nachricht > > irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und > vernichten Sie diese Nachricht. > > Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Nachricht > ist nicht gestattet. > > > > This information may contain confidential and/or privileged information. > > If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this > > information in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy > this information. > > Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in > this information is strictly forbidden. > > ====================================================================== > > = > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: gpfsug-discuss <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von > > Christoph Martin > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Februar 2024 17:24 > > An: gpfsug main discussion list <[email protected]> > > Betreff: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-scale-object > > > > Hi Daniel, > > > > Am 28.02.24 um 17:06 schrieb Kidger, Daniel: > >> I would assume it is because most customers want to use the S3 > Interface rather than the Swift one? > > > > And Openstack/Swift is very complex. So I can understand why IBM gets > > rid of it. > > But 5.1.9.1 has no object support at all. There is no S3 interface. > > > > Christoph > > _______________________________________________ > > gpfsug-discuss mailing list > > gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org > > http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org > > -- > Stephan Graf > HPC, Cloud and Data Systems and Services Juelich Supercomputing Centre > > Phone: +49-2461-61-6578 > Fax: +49-2461-61-6656 > E-mail: [email protected] > WWW: http://www.fz-juelich.de/jsc/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH > 52425 Juelich > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich > Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498 > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Stefan M?ller > Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Astrid Lambrecht (Vorsitzende), Karsten > Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Dr. Ir. Peter Jansens > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > gpfsug-discuss mailing list > gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org > http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org
