Storage Scale is evaluating RHEL10 and aiming to support the new major RHEL10 OS in the early 4Q release of 2025. Please note that this is a tentative support timeline and subject to change at our discretion, and can be adjusted as needed but it's actively being worked.
________________________________ From: gpfsug-discuss <[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2025 4:00 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL] gpfsug-discuss Digest, Vol 156, Issue 6 Send gpfsug-discuss mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of gpfsug-discuss digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: mmdsh rest api command (Jonathan Buzzard) 2. RHEL 10 (Jonathan Buzzard) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 18:18:07 +0100 From: Jonathan Buzzard <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] mmdsh rest api command Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed On 21/07/2025 22:51, Steve Daniels wrote: > > There are three different methods (two really) of allowing internode > communications for the ssh commanding. > > Centralized management where select nodes have one way root passwordless > ssh access to all of the rest of the nodes and n-to-n where all nodes > have access to all other nodes via passwordless ssh. > When the central administration mode was first introduced you still needed n-to-n ssh access or it all still fell apart despite being only able to issue "administration" commands from the central nodes. From recollection a slew of what I would call "user" commands (such as changing an ACL on your *own* files for example) all stopped working unless the n-to-n was maintained. I am not precluding that this had changed in the meantime, but once bitten twice shy as they say. I still maintain reinventing the wheel, which will be a whole bunch of infrequently tested code paths is a really bad idea in the modern security threat environment. JAB. -- Jonathan A. Buzzard Tel: +44141-5483420 HPC System Administrator, ARCHIE-WeSt. University of Strathclyde, John Anderson Building, Glasgow. G4 0NG ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 18:19:00 +0100 From: Jonathan Buzzard <[email protected]> To: gpfsug main discussion list <[email protected]> Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] RHEL 10 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Obviously with all the usual caveats etc. is there a timeline for RHEL10 to be supported? JAB. -- Jonathan A. Buzzard Tel: +44141-5483420 HPC System Administrator, ARCHIE-WeSt. University of Strathclyde, John Anderson Building, Glasgow. G4 0NG ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org ------------------------------ End of gpfsug-discuss Digest, Vol 156, Issue 6 **********************************************
_______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org
