I'm not sure what kind of report you're looking for, but the `du` command has a 
"--apparent-size" option that has this description:
              print apparent sizes, rather than disk usage; although the 
apparent size is usually smaller, it may be larger due to holes in (âsparseâ) 
files, internal fragmentation, indirect blocks, and the like

This can be used to get the actual amount of space that files are using.

I think that mmrepquota and mmlsquota show twice the amount of space of the 
actual file due to the replication, but somebody correct me if I'm mistaken.

I also would like to know what the output of the ILM "LIST" policy reports for 
KB_ALLOCATED for replicated files.  Is it the replicated amount of data?

Thanks,
-Bryan

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan Foster
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 5:06 AM
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Quotas, replication and hsm

On 27 October 2015 at 17:28, Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT
Services) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If we have replication enabled on a file, does the size from ls -l or du 
> return the actual file size, or the replicated file size (I.e. Twice the 
> actual size)?.
>
> From experimentation, it appears to be double the actual size, I.e. Taking 
> into account replication of 2.
>
> This appears to mean that quotas have to be double what we actually want to 
> take account of the replication factor.
>
> Is this correct?

This is what we obverse here by default and currently have to double our 
fileset quotas to take this is to account on replicated filesystems.

You've reminded me that I was going to ask this list if it's possible to report 
the un-replicated sizes? While the quota management is only a slight pain, 
what's reported to the user is more of a problem for us(e.g. via SMB share / df 
). We're considering replicating a lot more of our filesystems and it would be 
useful if it didn't appear that everyones quotas had just doubled overnight.

Thanks,
Dan.
--
Dan Foster | Senior Storage Systems Administrator | IT Services 
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

________________________________

Note: This email is for the confidential use of the named addressee(s) only and 
may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination 
or copying of this email is strictly prohibited, and to please notify the 
sender immediately and destroy this email and any attachments. Email 
transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The Company, 
therefore, does not make any guarantees as to the completeness or accuracy of 
this email or any attachments. This email is for informational purposes only 
and does not constitute a recommendation, offer, request or solicitation of any 
kind to buy, sell, subscribe, redeem or perform any type of transaction of a 
financial product.
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to