Hi Wayne. Just to come back to the mmbackup performance. Here the way we call it and the performance results: MTHREADS=1 QOPT="" # we check the lust run and set this to '-q' if required'
/usr/lpp/mmfs/bin/mmbackup /$FS -S $SNAPFILE -g /work/root/mmbackup -a 4 $QOPT -m $MTHREADS -B 1000 -N justt sms04c1 --noquote --tsm-servers home -v -------------------------------------------------------- mmbackup: Backup of /homeb begins at Mon Nov 9 00:03:30 MEZ 2015. -------------------------------------------------------- ... Mon Nov 9 00:03:35 2015 mmbackup:Scanning file system homeb Mon Nov 9 03:07:17 2015 mmbackup:File system scan of homeb is complete. Mon Nov 9 03:07:17 2015 mmbackup:Calculating backup and expire lists for server home Mon Nov 9 03:07:17 2015 mmbackup:Determining file system changes for homeb [home]. Mon Nov 9 03:44:33 2015 mmbackup:changed=126305, expired=10086, unsupported=0 for server [home] Mon Nov 9 03:44:33 2015 mmbackup:Finished calculating lists [126305 changed, 10086 expired] for server home. Mon Nov 9 03:44:33 2015 mmbackup:Sending files to the TSM server [126305 changed, 10086 expired]. Mon Nov 9 03:44:33 2015 mmbackup:Performing expire operations Mon Nov 9 03:45:32 2015 mmbackup:Completed policy expiry run with 0 policy errors, 0 files failed, 0 severe errors, returning r c=0. Mon Nov 9 03:45:32 2015 mmbackup:Policy for expiry returned 0 Highest TSM error 0 Mon Nov 9 03:45:32 2015 mmbackup:Performing backup operations Mon Nov 9 04:54:29 2015 mmbackup:Completed policy backup run with 0 policy errors, 0 files failed, 0 severe errors, returning r c=0. Mon Nov 9 04:54:29 2015 mmbackup:Policy for backup returned 0 Highest TSM error 0 Total number of objects inspected: 137562 Total number of objects backed up: 127476 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 10086 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred: 427 GB Total number of objects encrypted: 0 Total number of bytes inspected: 459986708656 Total number of bytes transferred: 459989351070 Mon Nov 9 04:54:29 2015 mmbackup:analyzing: results from home. Mon Nov 9 04:54:29 2015 mmbackup:Analyzing audit log file /homeb/mmbackup.audit.homeb.home Mon Nov 9 05:02:46 2015 mmbackup:updating /homeb/.mmbackupShadow.1.home with /homeb/.mmbackupCfg/tmpfile2.mmbackup.homeb Mon Nov 9 05:02:46 2015 mmbackup:Copying updated shadow file to the TSM server Mon Nov 9 05:03:51 2015 mmbackup:Done working with files for TSM Server: home. Mon Nov 9 05:03:51 2015 mmbackup:Completed backup and expire jobs. Mon Nov 9 05:03:51 2015 mmbackup:TSM server home had 0 failures or excluded paths and returned 0. Its shadow database has been updated. Shadow DB state:updated Mon Nov 9 05:03:51 2015 mmbackup:Completed successfully. exit 0 ---------------------------------------------------------- mmbackup: Backup of /homeb completed successfully at Mon Nov 9 05:03:51 MEZ 2015. ---------------------------------------------------------- Stephan On 10/28/15 14:36, Wayne Sawdon wrote: > > You have to use both options even if -N is only the local node. Sorry, > > -Wayne > > > > Inactive hide details for Stephan Graf ---10/28/2015 01:06:36 AM---Hi > Wayne! We are using -g, and we only want to run it on oneStephan Graf > ---10/28/2015 01:06:36 AM---Hi Wayne! We are using -g, and we only > want to run it on one node, so we don't use the -N option. > > From: Stephan Graf <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Date: 10/28/2015 01:06 AM > Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] ILM and Backup Question > Sent by: [email protected] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Hi Wayne! > > We are using -g, and we only want to run it on one node, so we don't > use the -N option. > > Stephan > > On 10/27/15 16:25, Wayne Sawdon wrote: > > > > From: Stephan Graf _<[email protected]>_ > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > We are running the mmbackup on an AIX system > > oslevel -s > > 6100-07-10-1415 > > Current GPFS build: "4.1.0.8 ". > > > > So we only use one node for the policy run. > > > > Even on one node you should see a speedup using -g and -N. > > -Wayne > > > _______________________________________________ > gpfsug-discuss mailing list > gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org > _http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_ > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH > 52425 Juelich > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich > Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498 > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher > Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Marquardt (Vorsitzender), > Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt, > Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > gpfsug-discuss mailing list > gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org > http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss > > > > > _______________________________________________ > gpfsug-discuss mailing list > gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org > http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
_______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
