Paul,

We currently run netbackup to push about 1.3PB of real data to tape. This using 1 nb master and a single media server that is also a GPFS client. The media server uses the spare file system space as a staging area before writing to tape. We have recently invested into a TSM server due to limitations of netbackup. The PVU licensing model makes TSM cost effective. We simply are not able to speed up the netbackup catalog even with SSD. You could potentially use the gpfs ilm engine to create file lists to feed to netbackup.

netbackup (now back to veritas) does not officially support GPFS. Netbackup is not aware of gpfs metadata.

Matt

On 12/2/15 4:22 PM, Sanchez, Paul wrote:
We have a relatively mature NetBackup environment which handles all of our tape backup requirements (e.g. databases, NetApp via NDMP, Windows shares, and native Linux – which provides rudimentary coverage of GPFS). Because of this existing base, we’re hesitant to invest in a completely separate infrastructure just for the benefit of GPFS backups. While this works well for many filesets, it’s not ideal for very large ones. We’ve been trying to get Veritas to support a more parallel file-scan and file-copy approach to backing up GPFS filesystems, and have repeatedly hit a brick wall there over the past year. But I have a recent thread in which they note that there is a fairly large and vocal GPFS customer who drives significant feature flow in their product. Any chance that customer is a member of the User Group? If so, I’d love to hear from you.
Thanks,
Paul


_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss



____
This email message is a private communication. The information transmitted, 
including attachments, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain confidential, privileged, and/or proprietary 
material. Any review, duplication, retransmission, distribution, or other use 
of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or 
entities other than the intended recipient is unauthorized by the sender and is 
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the 
sender immediately by return email and delete the original message from all 
computer systems. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to