Hi Roland I ran into that issue as well – if you are running 6.3 you need to update to get to the later levels. RH 6.3 is getting a bit dated, so an upgrade might be a good idea – but I all too well how hard it is to push through those updates!
Bob Oesterlin Sr Storage Engineer, Nuance HPC Grid From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Roland Pabel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Organization: RRZK Uni Köln Reply-To: gpfsug main discussion list <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 8:25 AM To: gpfsug main discussion list <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Executing Callbacks on other Nodes Hi Bob, thanks for your remarks. I already understood that deadlocks are more timeouts than "tangled up balls of code". I was not (yet) planning on changing the whole routine, I'd just like to get a notice when something unexpected happens in the cluster. So, first, I just want to write these notices into a file and email it once it reaches a certain size. From what you are saying, it sounds like it is worth upgrading to 4.1.1.x . We are planning a maintenance next month, I'll try to get this into the todo- list. Upgrading beyond this is going require a longer preparation, unless the prerequisite of "RHEL 6.4 or later" as stated on the IBM FAQ is irrelevant. Our clients still run RHEL 6.3. Best regards, Roland
_______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
