Hi Everyone,

I've noticed that many GPFS commands (mm*acl,mm*attr) and API calls (in 
particular the putacl and getacl functions) have no support for not following 
symlinks. Is there some hidden support for gpfs_putacl that will cause it to 
not deteference symbolic links? Something like the O_NOFOLLOW flag used 
elsewhere in linux?

Thanks!

-Aaron
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to