I agree with this assessment.  I would also recommend looking into user defined 
node classes so that your mmlsconfig output is more easily readable, otherwise 
each node will be listed in the mmlsconfig output.

HTH,
-Bryan

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David D. Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 10:12 AM
To: gpfsug main discussion list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Changing verbsPorts On Single Node

I have a feeling that this is how mmchconfig is supposed to work. You’ve asked 
it to change the
configuration of one node, but the database of configuration settings needs to 
be propagated to
the entire cluster whenever a change is made.  You’ll find a section in the 
mmlsconfig output specific
to the node(s) that have been changed [node155] …. At this point your 
configuration may be out of
sync on any number of nodes.

 — ddj
Dave Johnson
Brown University CCV/CIS

On Feb 22, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Douglas Duckworth 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hello!

I am an HPC admin at Weill Cornell Medicine in the Upper East Side of 
Manhattan.  It's a great place with researchers working in many computationally 
demanding fields.  I am asked to do many new things all of the time so it's 
never boring.  Yesterday we deployed a server that's intended to create 
atomic-level image of a ribosome.  Pretty serious science!
We have two DDN GridScaler GPFS clusters with around 3PB of storage.  FDR 
Infiniband provides the interconnect.  Our compute nodes are Dell PowerEdge 
12/13G servers running Centos 6 and 7 while we're using SGE for scheduling.  
Hopefully soon Slurm.  We also have some GPU servers from Pengiun Computing, 
with GTX 1080s, as well a new Ryft FPGA accelerator.  I am hoping our next 
round of computing power will come from AMD...

Anyway, I've been using Ansible to deploy our new GPFS nodes as well as build 
all other things we need at WCM.  I thought that this was complete.  However, 
apparently, the GPFS client's been trying RDMA over port mlx4_0/2 though we 
need to use mlx4_0/1!  Rather than running mmchconfig against the entire 
cluster, I have been trying it locally on the node that needs to be addressed.  
For example:

sudo mmchconfig verbsPorts=mlx4_0/1 -i -N node155

When ran locally the desired change becomes permanent and we see RDMA active 
after restarting GPFS service on node.  Though mmchconfig still tries to run 
against all nodes in the cluster!  I kill it of course at the known_hosts step.

In addition I tried:

sudo mmchconfig verbsPorts=mlx4_0/1 -i -N node155 NodeClass=localhost

However the same result.

When doing capital "i" mmchconfig does attempt ssh with all nodes.  Yet the 
change does not persist after restarting GPFS.

So far I consulted the following documentation:

http://ibm.co/2mcjK3P
http://ibm.co/2lFSInH

Could anyone please help?

We're using GPFS client version 4.1.1-3 on Centos 6 nodes as well as 4.2.1-2 on 
those which are running Centos 7.

Thanks so much!

Best
Doug


Thanks,

Douglas Duckworth, MSc, LFCS
HPC System Administrator
Scientific Computing Unit
Physiology and Biophysics
Weill Cornell Medicine
E: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
O: 212-746-6305
F: 212-746-8690
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<http://spectrumscale.org>
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss


________________________________

Note: This email is for the confidential use of the named addressee(s) only and 
may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination 
or copying of this email is strictly prohibited, and to please notify the 
sender immediately and destroy this email and any attachments. Email 
transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The Company, 
therefore, does not make any guarantees as to the completeness or accuracy of 
this email or any attachments. This email is for informational purposes only 
and does not constitute a recommendation, offer, request or solicitation of any 
kind to buy, sell, subscribe, redeem or perform any type of transaction of a 
financial product.
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to