Or this ☺ From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org [mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Jan-Frode Myklebust Sent: 13 June 2017 05:42 To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces address move' weirdness?
Switch to node affinity policy, and it will stick to where you move it. "mmces address policy node-affinity". -jf tir. 13. jun. 2017 kl. 06.21 skrev <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu<mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu>>: On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 20:06:09 -0000, "Simon Thompson (IT Research Support)" said: > mmces node suspend -N > > Is what you want. This will move the address and stop it being assigned one, > otherwise the rebalance will occur. Yeah, I figured that part out. What I couldn't wrap my brain around was what the purpose of 'mmces address move' is if mmsysmon is going to just put it back... _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<http://spectrumscale.org> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
_______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
