Thankyou everyone for replies on this issue. Very helpful.

We have a test setup with three nodes, although no multi-pathed disks. So I can 
try out removing and replacing disks servers.
I agree with Simon that bringing up a second NIC is probably inviting Murphy in 
to play merry hell…

The option we are envisioning is re-installing the server(s) but leaving them 
with the existing FQDNs if we can.



From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Simon Thompson 
(IT Research Support)
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 4:28 PM
To: gpfsug main discussion list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Dual server NSDs - change of hostname

Yeah that was my thoughts too given Bob said you can update the server list for 
an NSD device in 5.0. I also thought that bringing up a second nic and changing 
the name etc could bring a whole world or danger from having split routing and 
rp_filter (been there, had the weirdness, RDMA traffic continues but admin 
traffic randomly fails, but hey, if you like the world crashing down around 
you….)

Simon

From: 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, 5 April 2018 at 14:37
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Dual server NSDs - change of hostname

To my mind this is simpler:  IF you can mmdelnode without too much suffering, 
do that. Then reconfigure the host name and whatever else you'd like to do. 
Then mmaddnode...

-- The information contained in this communication and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged, and is for the sole use of the intended 
recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is 
prohibited. Unless explicitly stated otherwise in the body of this 
communication or the attachment thereto (if any), the information is provided 
on an AS-IS basis without any express or implied warranties or liabilities. To 
the extent you are relying on this information, you are doing so at your own 
risk. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately by replying to this message and destroy all copies of this message 
and any attachments. Neither the sender nor the company/group of companies he 
or she represents shall be liable for the proper and complete transmission of 
the information contained in this communication, or for any delay in its 
receipt.
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to