Thing to do here ought to be using overrides in /etc/systemd, not modifying the vendor scripts. I can’t think of a case where one would want to do otherwise, but it may be out there.
-- ____ || \\UTGERS, |---------------------------*O*--------------------------- ||_// the State | Ryan Novosielski - [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> || \\ University | Sr. Technologist - 973/972.0922 (2x0922) ~*~ RBHS Campus || \\ of NJ | Office of Advanced Research Computing - MSB C630, Newark `' On May 16, 2018, at 11:30, Bryan Banister <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Malahal is correct, we did modify our version of the systemd unit and the update is being overwritten. My bad. We seemed to have issues with the original version, but will try to use the new version and will open a ticket if we have issues. Definitely do not want to modify the IBM provided configs as this is an obvious example of how that can come back to bite you!! Not symlink is needed as Malahal states. Sorry for the confusion and false alarms. Thanks Malahal!! -Bryan From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Malahal R Naineni Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 12:19 AM To: gpfsug main discussion list <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] What happened to /usr/bin/ganesha.nfsd in 5.0.1-0?? Note: External Email ________________________________ The systemd service file also was updated to account for the daemon binary rename (the rename itself was done to avoid SELinux issues). It is possible that the systemd was using an old cache (unlikely as I didn't see daemon-reload message here) or the rpm update couldn't update the file as user changed the systemd unit service file (most likely case here). Please provide "rpm -qV <ganesha-rpms>", the RPM shipped unit file should NOT have any reference to ganesha.nfsd (it should have gpfs.ganesha.nfsd). Regards, Malahal. PS: No symlink magic is necessary with usual cases! From: Jonathan Buzzard <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Date: 05/16/2018 12:01 AM Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] What happened to /usr/bin/ganesha.nfsd in 5.0.1-0?? Sent by: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ________________________________ On 15/05/18 19:08, Bryan Banister wrote: > BTW, I just tried the symlink option and it seems to work: > > # ln -s gpfs.ganesha.nfsd ganesha.nfsd > > # ls -ld ganesha.nfsd > Looks more like to me that the systemd service file needs updating so that it exec's a file that exists. One wonders how this got through QA mind you. JAB. -- Jonathan A. Buzzard Tel: +44141-5483420 HPC System Administrator, ARCHIE-WeSt. University of Strathclyde, John Anderson Building, Glasgow. G4 0NG _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<http://spectrumscale.org> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgpfsug.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fgpfsug-discuss&data=02%7C01%7Cnovosirj%40rutgers.edu%7C333d1c944c464856be7008d5bb41f07f%7Cb92d2b234d35447093ff69aca6632ffe%7C1%7C1%7C636620814253162614&sdata=ihaClVwGs9Cp69UflH7eYp%2F0q7%2FR29AY%2FbM1IzbZrsI%3D&reserved=0> ________________________________ Note: This email is for the confidential use of the named addressee(s) only and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email is strictly prohibited, and to please notify the sender immediately and destroy this email and any attachments. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The Company, therefore, does not make any guarantees as to the completeness or accuracy of this email or any attachments. This email is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation, offer, request or solicitation of any kind to buy, sell, subscribe, redeem or perform any type of transaction of a financial product. _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<http://spectrumscale.org> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgpfsug.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fgpfsug-discuss&data=02%7C01%7Cnovosirj%40rutgers.edu%7C333d1c944c464856be7008d5bb41f07f%7Cb92d2b234d35447093ff69aca6632ffe%7C1%7C1%7C636620814253162614&sdata=ihaClVwGs9Cp69UflH7eYp%2F0q7%2FR29AY%2FbM1IzbZrsI%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
