Hello,

I want to control which nodes can become token manager. In detail I run a 
virtual machine as quorum node. I don’t want this machine to become a token 
manager - it has no access to Infiniband and only very limited memory.

What I see is that ‘mmdiag –tokenmgr’ lists the machine as active token 
manager. The machine has role ‘quorum-client’. This doesn’t seem sufficient to 
exclude it.

Is there any way to tell spectrum scale to exclude this single machine with 
role quorum-client?

I run 5.0.1-1.

Sorry if this is a faq, I did search  quite a bit before I wrote to the list.

Thank you,

Heiner Billich


[root@node-2 ~]# mmlscluster

GPFS cluster information
========================
  GPFS cluster name:         node.psi.ch
  GPFS cluster id:           5389874024582403895
  GPFS UID domain:           node.psi.ch
  Remote shell command:      /usr/bin/ssh
  Remote file copy command:  /usr/bin/scp
  Repository type:           CCR

Node  Daemon node name       IP address     Admin node name        Designation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1   node-1.psi.ch       a.b.95.31  node-1.psi.ch       quorum-manager
   2   node-2.psi.ch       a.b.95.32  node-2.psi.ch       quorum-manager
   3   node-quorum.psi.ch  a.b.95.30  node-quorum.psi.ch  quorum                
       <<<< VIRTUAL MACHINE >>>>>>>>>

[root@node-2 ~]# mmdiag --tokenmgr

=== mmdiag: tokenmgr ===
  Token Domain perf
    There are 3 active token servers in this domain.
    Server list:
      a.b.95.120
      a.b.95.121
      a.b.95.122    <<<< VIRTUAL MACHINE >>>>>>>>>
  Token Domain tiered
    There are 3 active token servers in this domain.
    Server list:
      a.b.95.120
      a.b.95.121
      a.b.95.122   <<<< VIRTUAL MACHINE >>>>>>>>>

--
Paul Scherrer Institut
Science IT
Heiner Billich
WHGA 106
CH 5232  Villigen PSI
056 310 36 02
https://www.psi.ch

_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to