Ah, thanks Markus, that’s what I was looking for.

Andrew yes, the service account has been created now, I am more interested in 
the “what if” we didn’t change things. I suppose this is the result of ~4 years 
of technical debt on our part!

Thanks,
Richard


From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org 
<gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org> On Behalf Of Markus Rohwedder
Sent: 04 September 2018 14:41
To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Cc: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] CES file authentication - bind account deleted?


Hello.

the user name should not matter for operations beyon domain join.

mmuserauth man page:

--user-name userName

....

In case of --type ad with
--data-access-method file, the specified username
is used to join the cluster to AD domain. It results in
creating a machine account for the cluster based on the
--netbios-name specified in the command. After
successful configuration, the cluster connects with its
machine account, and not the user used during the domain
join. So the specified username after domain join has no
role to play in communication with the AD domain
controller and can be even deleted from the AD server.
The cluster can still keep using AD for authentication
via the machine account created.


Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards

Dr. Markus Rohwedder

Spectrum Scale GUI Development

________________________________



Phone:

+49 7034 6430190

IBM Deutschland Research & Development

[cid:image002.png@01D4445D.C716BB30]

E-Mail:

rohwed...@de.ibm.com<mailto:rohwed...@de.ibm.com>

Am Weiher 24





65451 Kelsterbach





Germany

________________________________




[Inactive hide details for "Andrew Beattie" ---04.09.2018 15:18:43---Hi 
Richard,]"Andrew Beattie" ---04.09.2018 15:18:43---Hi Richard,

From: "Andrew Beattie" <abeat...@au1.ibm.com<mailto:abeat...@au1.ibm.com>>
To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Cc: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Date: 04.09.2018 15:18
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] CES file authentication - bind account deleted?
Sent by: 
gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org>

________________________________



Hi Richard,

If you are setting up Protocol authentication against the active directory,
would you not choose to use a service account that isn't going to get deleted?

If you choose to use an user account of a Sys Admin who has Domain admin 
privileges and they leave the company and their account is deleted, you would 
almost certainly have issues with the Scale cluster trying to validate users 
permissions and having scale get an error from AD when the credentials that it 
uses are no longer valid.


Andrew Beattie
Software Defined Storage - IT Specialist
Phone: 614-2133-7927
E-mail: abeat...@au1.ibm.com<mailto:abeat...@au1.ibm.com>


----- Original message -----
From: "Sobey, Richard A" <r.so...@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk>>
Sent by: 
gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org>
To: "'gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org'" 
<gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>>
Cc:
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] CES file authentication - bind account deleted?
Date: Tue, Sep 4, 2018 8:45 AM

Hi all,

I don’t like using long subject lines as a rule so it probably doesn’t make 
sense, but consider:

FILE access configuration : AD

PARAMETERS VALUES

-------------------------------------------------

ENABLE_NFS_KERBEROS true

SERVERS domaincontroller.ic.ac.uk

USER_NAME joeblo...@ic.ac.uk<mailto:joeblo...@ic.ac.uk>

NETBIOS_NAME store

IDMAP_ROLE master

IDMAP_RANGE 10000000-299999999

IDMAP_RANGE_SIZE 1000000

UNIXMAP_DOMAINS IC(500 - 2000000)

LDAPMAP_DOMAINS none

If “joebloggs” was to leave the organization and that account deleted from 
Active Directory, what is the impact on file authentication in CES?

Thanks

Richard

_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss


_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to