This has been publically documented in the Spectrum Scale FAQ Q13.17,
Q13.18 and Q13.19.

Regards,

Richard Rupp, Sales Specialist, Phone: 1-347-510-6746




From:   "Daniel Kidger" <[email protected]>
To:     "gpfsug main discussion list"
            <[email protected]>
Date:   04/06/2019 10:12 AM
Subject:        Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Adding ESS to existing Scale Cluster
Sent by:        [email protected]



There is a non-technical issue you may need to consider.
IBM has set licensing rules about mixing in the same Spectrum Scale cluster
both ESS from IBM and 3rd party storage that is licensed under ESA/OEM
(Lenovo, DDN, Bull, Pixit et al.).

I am sure Carl Zetie or other IBMers who watch this list can explain the
exact restrictions.

Daniel

_________________________________________________________
Daniel Kidger
IBM Technical Sales Specialist
Spectrum Scale, Spectrum NAS and IBM Cloud Object Store

+44-(0)7818 522 266
[email protected]
                                     
                                     
                                     




On 3 Apr 2019, at 19:47, Sanchez, Paul <[email protected]> wrote:

            note though you can't have GNR based vdisks (ESS/DSS-G) in the
            same storage pool.

      At one time there was definitely a warning from IBM in the docs about
      not mixing big-endian and little-endian GNR in the same
      cluster/filesystem.   But at least since Nov 2017, IBM has published
      videos showing clusters containing both.  (In my opinion, they had to
      support this because they changed the endian-ness of the ESS from BE
      to LE.)

      I don't know about all ancillary components (e.g. GUI) but as for
      Scale itself, I can confirm that filesystems can contain NSDs which
      are provided by ESS(BE), ESS(LE), GSS, and DSS in all combinations,
      along with SAN storage based NSD servers.  We typically do rolling
      upgrades of GNR building blocks by adding blocks to an existing
      cluster, emptying and removing the existing blocks, upgrading those
      in isolation, then repeating with the next cluster.  As a result, we
      have had every combination in play at some point in time.  Care just
      needs to be taken with nodeclass naming and mmchconfig parameters.
      (We derive the correct params for each new building block from its
      final config after upgrading/testing it in isolation.)

      -Paul

      -----Original Message-----
      From: [email protected] <
      [email protected]> On Behalf Of Simon Thompson
      Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:18 PM
      To: gpfsug main discussion list <[email protected]>
      Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Adding ESS to existing Scale Cluster

      We have DSS-G (Lenovo equivalent) in the same cluster as other SAN/IB
      storage (IBM, DDN). But we don't have them in the same file-system.

      In theory as a different pool it should work, note though you can't
      have GNR based vdisks (ESS/DSS-G) in the same storage pool.

      And if you want to move to new block size or v5 variable sunblocks
      then you are going to have to have a new filesystem and copy data. So
      it depends what your endgame is really. We just did such a process
      and one of my colleagues is going to talk about it at the London user
      group in May.

      Simon
      ________________________________________
      From: [email protected] [
      [email protected]] on behalf of
      [email protected] [[email protected]]
      Sent: 03 April 2019 17:12
      To: [email protected]
      Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] Adding ESS to existing Scale Cluster

      We are planning to add an ESS GL6 system to our existing Spectrum
      Scale cluster. Can the ESS nodes be added to existing scale cluster
      without changing existing cluster name? Or do we need to create a new
      scale cluster with ESS and import existing filesystems into the new
      ESS cluster?

      Prasad Surampudi
      Sr. Systems Engineer
      The ATS Group





      _______________________________________________
      gpfsug-discuss mailing list
      gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
      http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
      _______________________________________________
      gpfsug-discuss mailing list
      gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
      http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gpfsug.org_mailman_listinfo_gpfsug-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=EXL-jEd1jmdzvOIhT87C7SIqmAS9uhVQ6J3kObct4OY&m=3KUx-vFPoAlAOV8zt_7RCV5o1kvr5LobB3JxXuR5-Rg&s=qsN98nblbvXfi2y1V40IAjyT_8DY3bwqk9pon-auNw4&e=



_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to