Not bad for having been awake for only half an hour.
________________________________
From: [email protected] 
<[email protected]> on behalf of Mathias Dietz 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 6:14:40 AM
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: [EXT] Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Enforce ACLs

WARNING: This email originated from outside of MD Anderson. Please validate the 
sender's email address before clicking on links or attachments as they may not 
be safe.
Jonathan is mostly right, except that the option is not in mmlsconfig but part 
of the filesystem configuration (mmlsfs,mmchfs)

# mmlsfs objfs -k
flag                value                    description
------------------- ------------------------ -----------------------------------
 -k                 nfs4                     ACL semantics in effect



Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards

Mathias Dietz

Spectrum Scale Development - Release Lead Architect (4.2.x)
Spectrum Scale RAS Architect
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IBM Deutschland
Am Weiher 24
65451 Kelsterbach
Phone: +49 70342744105
Mobile: +49-15152801035
E-Mail: [email protected]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz, Geschäftsführung: Dirk 
WittkoppSitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht 
Stuttgart, HRB 243294



From:        "Fosburgh,Jonathan" <[email protected]>
To:        "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date:        15/05/2019 12:52
Subject:        Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Enforce ACLs
Sent by:        [email protected]
________________________________



I'm not 100% sure this is that it is, but it is most likely your ACL config. If 
you have to use the nfsv4 ACLs, check in mmlsconfig to make sure you are only 
using nfsv4 ACLs. I think the options are posix, nfsv4, and both. I would guess 
you are set to both.

--
Jonathan Fosburgh
Principal Application Systems Analyst
IT Operations Storage Team
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
(713) 745-9346

________________________________

From: [email protected] 
<[email protected]> on behalf of Rehs, Philipp Helo 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 3:48:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [EXT] [gpfsug-discuss] Enforce ACLs

Hello,

we are using GPFS 4.2.3 and at the moment we are looking into acls and
inheritance.

I have the following acls on a directory:
#NFSv4 ACL
#owner:root
#group:root
special:owner@:rwxc:allow:FileInherit:DirInherit
(X)READ/LIST (X)WRITE/CREATE (X)APPEND/MKDIR (X)SYNCHRONIZE
(X)READ_ACL  (X)READ_ATTR  (X)READ_NAMED
(-)DELETE    (X)DELETE_CHILD (X)CHOWN        (X)EXEC/SEARCH
(X)WRITE_ACL (X)WRITE_ATTR (X)WRITE_NAMED

special:group@:r-x-:allow:FileInherit:DirInherit
(X)READ/LIST (-)WRITE/CREATE (-)APPEND/MKDIR (X)SYNCHRONIZE
(X)READ_ACL  (X)READ_ATTR  (X)READ_NAMED
(-)DELETE    (-)DELETE_CHILD (-)CHOWN        (X)EXEC/SEARCH (-
)WRITE_ACL (-)WRITE_ATTR (-)WRITE_NAMED

special:everyone@:----:allow:FileInherit:DirInherit
(-)READ/LIST (-)WRITE/CREATE (-)APPEND/MKDIR (-)SYNCHRONIZE (-
)READ_ACL  (-)READ_ATTR  (-)READ_NAMED
(-)DELETE    (-)DELETE_CHILD (-)CHOWN        (-)EXEC/SEARCH (-
)WRITE_ACL (-)WRITE_ATTR (-)WRITE_NAMED

user:userABC:rwx-:allow:FileInherit:DirInherit
(X)READ/LIST (X)WRITE/CREATE (X)APPEND/MKDIR (X)SYNCHRONIZE
(X)READ_ACL  (X)READ_ATTR  (X)READ_NAMED
(X)DELETE    (X)DELETE_CHILD (-)CHOWN        (X)EXEC/SEARCH (-
)WRITE_ACL (X)WRITE_ATTR (X)WRITE_NAMED



Then the user creates a new folder in this directory and it does not
get the same acl but normal unix permissions.
Is there any way to enforce the new permissions from the parent?

Kind regards
Philipp

--
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Zentrum für Informations- und Medientechnologie
Kompetenzzentrum für wissenschaftliches Rechnen und Speichern

Universitätsstraße 1
Gebäude 25.41
Raum 00.51

Telefon: +49-211-81-15557
Mail: [email protected]
The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, 
confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain 
protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with 
applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an 
authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, 
disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any 
attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If 
you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify 
the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents 
from your systems._______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss



The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, 
confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain 
protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with 
applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an 
authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, 
disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any 
attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If 
you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify 
the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents 
from your systems.
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to