I wasn't but ...

If your metadata is in the same RG/DA as your data, even if it’s a separate 
pool, the contention is the same. But if you have 2 DAs, then you have more 
spinning disks underneath to provide iops anyway.

We only separate our metadata and data into pools because we want to replicate 
the metadata between DSS-G systems, but not data. And also have some data which 
is replicated but not all, and the only way we could figure to do that is by 
having separate pools and failure groups. i.e. we didn't want data in the 
system pool that wasn't replicated being placed on the second site.

And I agree, block sizes don't matter so much anymore, except remember the 
"variable" sub-blocks are based on the smallest block size used, so we ended up 
with 16MB blocks for both data and metadata.

Simon

On 04/07/2019, 04:56, "[email protected] on behalf of 
Ryan Novosielski" <[email protected] on behalf of 
[email protected]> wrote:

    Hi there,
    
    Was at the Lenovo GNR/GPFS 5.x seminar the other week and we briefly 
discussed whether or not the recommendation was to place data in the system 
pool (eg. have one combined system/data pool), or to have them separate. We’ve 
got a GSS26 that we are creating new filesystems on for high speed scratch (16 
MB blocks).
    
    I unfortunately did not note all of the considerations/caveats related to 
this choice. Does anyone who knows/was there and can remember remind me?
    
    The recollection I have is that you may have some contention for I/O if 
your metadata is on your data disks, and you won’t be able to have different 
redundancy settings. Once upon a time, block size also mattered, but not so 
much on 5.x.
    
    Thanks!
    
    --
    ____
    || \\UTGERS,         
|---------------------------*O*---------------------------
    ||_// the State      |         Ryan Novosielski - [email protected]
    || \\ University | Sr. Technologist - 973/972.0922 (2x0922) ~*~ RBHS Campus
    ||  \\    of NJ      | Office of Advanced Research Computing - MSB C630, 
Newark
         `'
    
    _______________________________________________
    gpfsug-discuss mailing list
    gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
    http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
    

_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to