Disregarding all the other reasons not to run it on the NSDs,  many years of 
rsync on GPFS has shown us it is ALWAYS faster from clients with reasonable 
networks and no other overhead.

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
<[email protected]> On Behalf Of Giovanni Bracco
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 8:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] naive question about rsync: run it on a client or on 
NSD server?

We must replicate about 100 TB data between two filesystems supported by two 
different storages (DDN9900 and DDN7990) both connected to the same NSD servers 
(6 of them) and we plan to use rsync.

Non special GPFS attributes, just the standard POSIX one, we plan to use the 
standard rsync.

The question:
is there any advantage in running the rsync on one of the NSD server or is 
better to run it on a client?

The environment:
GPFS 4.2.3.19, NSD CentOS7.4,  clients mostly CentOS6.4 (connected by IB
QDR) and CentOS7.3 (connected by OPA), connection between NSD and storage with 
IB QDR)

Giovanni

--
Giovanni Bracco
phone  +39 351 8804788
E-mail  [email protected]
WWW 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.afs.enea.it/bracco__;!!KGKeukY!g5RuD3fGuhmAJMIOdC_LgW0sNdejJCxdMTaLQfVtFcySDF1pkEvsTgu9tB2V$
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss__;!!KGKeukY!g5RuD3fGuhmAJMIOdC_LgW0sNdejJCxdMTaLQfVtFcySDF1pkEvsTn2QwFQn$
 
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to