Hi,
we have a GPFS cluster version 4.2.3.19. We have seen in the official
"Administration and Programming Reference" (version 4 Release 2.0, pag.
28) that the read-only mount option (-o ro) is not explicitly cited.
This option is supported in version 5.*.
However we tried, as a test, the -o ro mount option on two clients with
the following SO and kernels
client 1
CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core)
uname -r
3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64
client 2
CentOS release 6.4 (Final)
uname -r
2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.x86_64
and it worked fine.
The -o ro option is non permanent in the sense that unmounting and
remounting the file system on these clients it turned in r/w original state.
Now, we have the necessity of setting read-only the file system on all
clients of our cluster.
The question is: could we safely use the -o ro option for all clients
even if this option is not cited in the official (v. 4 release 2.0)
documentation?
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Agostino Funel
--
Agostino Funel
DTE-ICT-HPC
ENEA
P.le E. Fermi 1
80055 Portici (Napoli) Italy
Phone: (+39) 081-7723575
Fax: (+39) 081-7723344
E-mail: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.afs.enea.it/funel
==================================================
Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone
indicate e la casella di posta elettronica da cui e' stata inviata e' da
qualificarsi quale strumento aziendale.
La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di
queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate (art. 616 c.p, D.Lgs. n.
196/2003 s.m.i. e GDPR Regolamento - UE 2016/679).
Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati
di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua
distruzione. Grazie.
This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged
information intended for the addressee(s) only.
Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised (art.
616 c.p, D.Lgs. n. 196/2003 and subsequent amendments and GDPR UE 2016/679).
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any
attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail. Thanks.
==================================================
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
