While these all are valid points, I had several support cases in the last months where I got feedback that the issue will be fixed in 5.0.5 or 5.1.0 . So there has to be a list of fixes even in a .0 release, that didn't made it to the last PTF of the previous release.
Christian Achim Rehor wrote: > Yes, Carl, > > i guess that's what he is looking for ... but Simon has a valid point. > Against what would we count bug fixes, as it is a .0 release ? ;) > I would guess that's why we never did list "Problems fixed in ..." in the > README of the .0 releases. > Changes are documented, but these are feature changes new to 5.0.5 (as > opposed to 5.0.4) > > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards > > Achim Rehor > Simon Thompson wrote: > Well there is an interesting question there ... > > Where would you start counting the "bugs" from? > > 5.0.4.0? or 0.0? Or 5.0.4.4? > > So I think there is a valid point somewhere in there __ > > Simon
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
