Frederick, Yes on both counts! - mmdf is showing pretty uniform (ie 5 NSDs out of 30 report 65% free; All others are uniform at 58% free)...
NSD servers per disks are called in round-robin fashion as well, for example: gpfs1 tier2_001 nsd02-ib,nsd03-ib,nsd04-ib,tsm01-ib,nsd01-ib gpfs1 tier2_002 nsd03-ib,nsd04-ib,tsm01-ib,nsd01-ib,nsd02-ib gpfs1 tier2_003 nsd04-ib,tsm01-ib,nsd01-ib,nsd02-ib,nsd03-ib gpfs1 tier2_004 tsm01-ib,nsd01-ib,nsd02-ib,nsd03-ib,nsd04-ib Any other potential culprits to investigate? I do notice nsd03/nsd04 have long waiters, but nsd01 doesn't (nsd02-ib is offline for now): [nsd03-ib ~]# mmdiag --waiters === mmdiag: waiters === Waiting 6.5113 sec since 17:17:33, monitored, thread 4175 NSDThread: for I/O completion Waiting 6.3810 sec since 17:17:33, monitored, thread 4127 NSDThread: for I/O completion Waiting 6.1959 sec since 17:17:34, monitored, thread 4144 NSDThread: for I/O completion nsd04-ib: Waiting 13.1386 sec since 17:19:09, monitored, thread 9971 NSDThread: for I/O completion Waiting 10.3562 sec since 17:19:12, monitored, thread 9958 NSDThread: for I/O completion Waiting 10.0338 sec since 17:19:12, monitored, thread 9951 NSDThread: for I/O completion tsm01-ib: Waiting 8.1211 sec since 17:20:24, monitored, thread 3644 NSDThread: for I/O completion Waiting 7.6690 sec since 17:20:24, monitored, thread 3641 NSDThread: for I/O completion Waiting 7.4969 sec since 17:20:24, monitored, thread 3658 NSDThread: for I/O completion Waiting 7.3573 sec since 17:20:24, monitored, thread 3642 NSDThread: for I/O completion nsd01-ib: Waiting 0.2548 sec since 17:21:47, monitored, thread 30513 NSDThread: for I/O completion Waiting 0.1502 sec since 17:21:47, monitored, thread 30529 NSDThread: for I/O completion Thanks, Oluwasijibomi (Siji) Saula HPC Systems Administrator / Information Technology Research 2 Building 220B / Fargo ND 58108-6050 p: 701.231.7749 / www.ndsu.edu<http://www.ndsu.edu/> [cid:[email protected]] ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 4:56 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: gpfsug-discuss Digest, Vol 101, Issue 6 Send gpfsug-discuss mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of gpfsug-discuss digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Introducing SSUG::Digital (Simon Thompson (Spectrum Scale User Group Chair)) 2. Client Latency and High NSD Server Load Average (Saula, Oluwasijibomi) 3. Re: Client Latency and High NSD Server Load Average (Frederick Stock) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 20:11:17 +0100 From: "Simon Thompson (Spectrum Scale User Group Chair)" <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] Introducing SSUG::Digital Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi All., I happy that we can finally announce SSUG:Digital, which will be a series of online session based on the types of topic we present at our in-person events. I know it?s taken use a while to get this up and running, but we?ve been working on trying to get the format right. So save the date for the first SSUG:Digital event which will take place on Thursday 18th June 2020 at 4pm BST. That?s: San Francisco, USA at 08:00 PDT New York, USA at 11:00 EDT London, United Kingdom at 16:00 BST Frankfurt, Germany at 17:00 CEST Pune, India at 20:30 IST We estimate about 90 minutes for the first session, and please forgive any teething troubles as we get this going! (I know the times don?t work for everyone in the global community!) Each of the sessions we run over the next few months will be a different Spectrum Scale Experts or Deep Dive session. More details at: https://www.spectrumscaleug.org/introducing-ssugdigital/ (We?ll announce the speakers and topic of the first session in the next few days ?) Thanks to Ulf, Kristy, Bill, Bob and Ted for their help and guidance in getting this going. We?re keen to include some user talks and site updates later in the series, so please let me know if you might be interested in presenting in this format. Simon Thompson SSUG Group Chair -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss/attachments/20200603/e839fc73/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 21:45:05 +0000 From: "Saula, Oluwasijibomi" <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] Client Latency and High NSD Server Load Average Message-ID: <dm6pr08mb5324b014bc4aa03ccf25557598...@dm6pr08mb5324.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hello, Anyone faced a situation where a majority of NSDs have a high load average and a minority don't? Also, is 10x NSD server latency for write operations than for read operations expected in any circumstance? We are seeing client latency between 6 and 9 seconds and are wondering if some GPFS configuration or NSD server condition may be triggering this poor performance. Thanks, Oluwasijibomi (Siji) Saula HPC Systems Administrator / Information Technology Research 2 Building 220B / Fargo ND 58108-6050 p: 701.231.7749 / www.ndsu.edu<http://www.ndsu.edu/> [cid:[email protected]] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss/attachments/20200603/2ac14173/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 21:56:04 +0000 From: "Frederick Stock" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Client Latency and High NSD Server Load Average Message-ID: <of4256061c.b3ca8966-on0025857c.00786c34-0025857c.00787...@notes.na.collabserv.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss/attachments/20200603/c252f3b9/attachment.html> ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss End of gpfsug-discuss Digest, Vol 101, Issue 6 **********************************************
_______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
