Hi Thomas, yes, I'm doing this on top of gPodder 2.20, as I know it better, but I will switch to the tres branch as soon as I'm confident with the 2.20 build. I'll also submit patches this week-end against tres.
Finally, I'd like confirmation that the bundles work on at list 1 other machine before offering it to the end users (don't want to scare them away from gPodder). Cheers, Eric > Hi Eric, > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 07:56:07PM +0100, Eric Le Lay wrote: > > I've assembled a native application for Mac OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard) > > x86_64. It contains gPodder and its dependencies and doesn't require > > anything aside from the standard system libraries. > > It is not an X11 application, but uses the Gtk-quartz backend. > > Wow, that sounds very interesting! If we could provide a > native-looking and self-contained "gPodder.app" experience, that > would be great for many OS X users, I suppose. Are you developing > this on top of the "master" branch (2.x) or "tres" (Really Soon > Now(tm) 3.x)? It would be great if we could have that soon after the > 3.0.0 release, and even offer it by default for end users (while > advanced users can still choose the MacPorts version, or build from > source). > > I haven't had time to test it personally (currently all my gPodder > time is devoted to getting gPodder 3.0.0 in shape and out there), but > would be very happy to see this become stable and also to merge any > changes that you think might be worth getting back into the main > repository. > > > Thanks, > Thomas > > _______________________________________________ > gpodder-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/gpodder-devel _______________________________________________ gpodder-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/gpodder-devel
