On Friday 28 May 2010 21:31:08 Daniel Verkamp wrote: > > Does anyone remember how to get meaningful values from "size" nowadays? > > (It seems to severely over-report the size of .text; I have a vague > > memory that we tracked this down to the fact that "size" erroneously > > includes some debugging information within its count.) > > Passing -fno-dwarf2-cfi-asm to gcc avoids creating .eh_frame sections, > which get included in the "text" total (at least according to > Makefile.housekeeping); alternatively, size -A prints sizes for > individual sections separately.
Thanks. I was actually getting valid results from "size", I was just mentally reading them in base 16 instead of base 10. (D'oh.) Michael _______________________________________________ gPXE-devel mailing list [email protected] http://etherboot.org/mailman/listinfo/gpxe-devel
