On Tuesday 06 Jul 2010 22:09:01 Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> 2010/7/6 Piotr Jaroszyński <[email protected]>:
> > While we are looking at tcp, there is also an access after free, which
> > is maybe fixed in [1]. Maybe because I am lazy and didn't look at the
> > RFC yet, so not sure whether moving the timestamp update is safe.
> >
> > [1] -
> > http://git.etherboot.org/?p=people/peper/gpxe.git;a=commitdiff;h=979a414a
> >37dd11f155933238fc5b6cb25a0646d8
> 
> Heh ok, it's obviously wrong because the seq changes, but at least
> shows where the problem is :)

Good catch!

  http://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/68c2f07

Michael
_______________________________________________
gPXE-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://etherboot.org/mailman/listinfo/gpxe-devel

Reply via email to