On 28 March 2010 11:42, Jonathan Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > In that case could not waitfor simply be a macro within gpxe as all the > underlying functions would be in the codebase ? :-D
I think the idea is to just keep trying what you want to accomplish instead of doing some additional check to see whether the server is up at all. > I prefer readable simple functions, the "chain" in the above code does > not seem obvious or friendly, also I cant even see how that loop escapes > - to me it reads as stuck as "goto" is not conditional? Chain is like exec(), it doesn't return if successful. -- Best Regards Piotr Jaroszyński _______________________________________________ gPXE mailing list [email protected] http://etherboot.org/mailman/listinfo/gpxe
