> >I would think that the Graffito integration would be implemented with > >Jackrabbit, right? > > I was thinking so (graffito being on top of Jackrabbit), but this > description of Graffito looks more just like a JCR compliant API (which > level?) on top of the current existing code base rather than a full > refactoring.
I think other than creating a jcr compliant client API (on top of jackrabbit) does not make sense at all and is also unneeded since jackrabbit as the reference implementation will be fully level 2 compliant (with all optional features). It will also support "dynamic" node type creation (by adding nodes of type nt:nodeType to the jcr repo). regards, oliver
