> > I don't speak for the _RI_ of JAXB but it was really helpful to change > > the mapping schema and let the > > according beans are generated automatically. This definetly saved me > > many hours because > > I had 3 or 4 major structural changes and of course many small ones. > > > > I wouldn't vote +1 for a JAXB implementation in general but I definitely > > vote +1 for a stable library > > supporting XML binding. > > > > What I don't like about JAXB 1.0 is that one cannot add interface > > statements to the generated > > beans. This would make the persistance strategy of the mapping model > > more exchangeable and maybe > > it would make some adapter classes easier.
Could we sum this up to have some more clarity? Currently I would like to get involved more but I am not sure what is being worked on. oliver
