2005/7/28, Sandro Böhme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Another open aspect for votes or discussions is: > > ++ Do we want to restrict the jcr-capable classes to be only Java beans? ++ > > +1 from Christophe > 0 from me as I would not block using only Java beans. But I would favour > to use > Java beans as default (without complex getter and setter in the xml > file) like > Christophe and as an alternative: give the user the possibility to specify > different method names for the get- and set-method's if needed but with a > more complex xml file in this case.
+1
