Christophe Lombart wrote:
+0 because I think tools like Digester is so simple to use in such case.
Please, make a small document on the xml schema to use for the mapping.
Christophe.
Do I understand it right, that you vote +0 for XML-schema and Digester
is simple to use with
XML-schema?
What should the document contain?
Sandro
2005/8/2, Oliver Kiessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Regarding XML-schema:
I think we will need a definition for the XML file somehow or other. Be
it in writing form, a DTD or a
XML-schema. The schema is the more advanced than DTD. The user will have
a valid XML file as
early as possible. I think the writing form of explaining the definition
is much more work if it has the same
quality as the schema.
I think we need a XML-schema ballot in order to be able to close the
ballot about the persistence
technology of the mapping model.
++ Please vote if you think we need a XML schema for the XML file of the
mapping model. ++
ok. I think you have a point here, therefore I vote +1.
oliver
