2005/8/4, Oliver Kiessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I have read it and I basically don't disagree (I said we either need a > dtd, xml schema or documentation). ;) But Sandro has a different > standpoint (he wants XML Schema). >
Why a XML schema is just better than DTD (for managing a config file) ? The config file is so simple and no update are required. Last question : which tools (xml schema based) can be used without generating some classes ? > I have worked with digester and beanutils before, so I know how it can > be done. But I am would like to see the code anyways if possible. > I just commited the code - See on : * The package : org.apache.portals.graffito.jcr.mapper & org.apache.portals.graffito.jcr.mapper.model : This one is there to read the xml file * See the class GenericConverter to get an idea on how I'm using the mapper class. * Not all stuffs are implemented and the work made by Sandro has to be merged. Still consider it as a prototype. * See the repo mapping file : jcrmapping.xml. The DTD is not defined. > I am just saying we are discussing for days now over the XML schema > issue without any progress so far. > > The votes for using XML Schema so far. > +1 sandro > -1 christophe > 0 oliver > > Does there have to be a majority or an unanimous decision (all votes +1)? > We should all be agree on the tools and the foundation. Raphaël and David, can you also vote ? Thanks Unfortunatly, I'm going to be on vacation for 2 weeks (Hope to have a internet connection to follow this thread :-) ). Christophe
