Sandro, I don't understand you. The proposal #3 is to show the difference between an XMLBeans (or similar tools) and Digester, BeanUtil implementation - no ?
Christophe 2005/8/22, Sandro Böhme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > So I guess, you are not +1 for the XML schema. Because in that case I > wouldn't need > to go into the details of XMLBeans. > > Sandro > > Christophe Lombart wrote: > > >Ok so let's go for the proposal #3. At least, we are agree on the > >components organisations. That's maybe the more important. It should > >be nice if you can commit your code in a branch. > > > >Tomorrow, I'm going to commit new stuffs and I would like to send a > >mail on the Jackrabbit mailing list in order to find more interested > >guys. > > > >Christophe > > > >2005/8/22, Sandro Böhme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > >>Hi Christophe, > >> > >>in my email from the 6.8. I wrote: > >>"+1 for 3. I'm not sure if it is needed to check my prototype in. > >>But for me it's more about finding good arguments and consensus. > >>That would lead to a situation where everybody is willing to support the > >>way to go instead of > >>having one who is overruled and don't really understands why." > >> > >>And in a later email: > >>"Hello Christophe, > >> > >>if you are back from vacation and read my arguments and you are +1 for > >>Digester anyway, I'm > >>+0 for Digester for not slowing down the project. Basically because it > >>is only a matter of work > >>to keep the XML file specification in sync with the mapping class model > >>and it will not have > >>any impact to the user. > >> > >>But at the moment I don't see any arguments contra XML schema." > >> > >>regards, > >> > >>Sandro > >> > >>Christophe Lombart wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Hi All, > >>> > >>>If I follow this thread, here is the result : > >>> > >>>proposal #3 : David, Oliver and myself. > >>>Sandro ? > >>> > >>>Christophe > >>> > >>>2005/8/11, Oliver Kiessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>>I afraid with my simple mind I did not completely understand why the > >>>>>user has to deal with the java classes generated > >>>>>by XML beans. Do you mean something like a GUI that creates the mapping > >>>>>xml file? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>yes, a GUI is one example (also ant tasks, maven etc.). Instead of > >>>>having to write mappings by hand, one could generate them (by using > >>>>java classes). I think XML Beans makes it really easy to create > >>>>individual mappings. > >>>> > >>>>oliver > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
