* For the converters (primary and object/item) :
I have also one converter class which can be more flexible if it is
based your object/item converter. Give me a couple of days to merge
our codes.
Both of us have good reasons why we implemented our converters this way.
So I guess
it would be the best if we could have a phone call (Skype?) and can look
at both of our
code with vnc. But I configured my computer to be in a private network
which would
make it harder to work with vnc (I need to configure a tunnel). So maybe
we can have
at least a short phone call at any time.
Both the nt-registration and the converters depend on the mapping model.
So if we all
can agree to a class structure of the mapping model (independend of the
persistence
of this structure) we can build the other components on top of it.
Regards,
Sandro
