Sandro Böhme wrote:
Or if you already have an opinion, please vote:
[ ] +1 for a seperate config file only for the registration of custom
node types
[ ] 0 don't care
[ ] -1 for having one mapping graph in one configuration file
It is quite difficult to vote on that now. I don't know. Let's start
with a prototype and we will see. See the proposal to get my
technical point of view. I'm going to commit it in the doc suproject.
By this way, you can modify it.
It's the same for me. I also think it's difficult to decide.
So if we use a custom_nodetypes.xml file - would it be ok for you, to
use XMLBeans?
I can understand to not use XMLBeans or something similar for a XML file
with a small
DTD. But I afraid the definition for the custom_nodetypes.xml will be
bigger...
What do you think?
In which usecase would you use XMLBeans in general?
