#: Christophe Lombart changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 1/3/2006
2:09 PM :#
I don't see what kind of scenarios. Can you explain more ?
Are you using directly the ObjectConverter without the
PersistenceManager ? Are you extending the PersistenceManager ?
Christophe
As you figured it out, I am using directly the ObjectConverter. I have created a few util classes to
have everything configured from Spring.
Now, about the scenario: imagine a service that is working with different node subtrees, but these
are related, either by their content, or by their references. In this case I need to pass around
different information (and not all of it is stored in my model, but sometimes is available only in
the node itself). In this scenario after each insert/update i need to get my hand on the
inserted/updated node.
Does it make any sense to you?
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 1/3/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again!
I was trying to figure out if changing the ObjectConverter interface to return
the inserted/updated
node would make sense. I have scenarios where I would like to continue working
with the new/updated
node, and the only way to do it is to look for it after these operations.
What do you think about this?
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
!DSPAM:43ba699065211095916276!
