On 2/3/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > Thanks for the explanation about how it works. Considering that I had > problems running the suite > from withing the IDE, I have modified the base test to use the Jackrabbit API > to import custom nodes. > > Considering that there is no specification to handle custom node types, I > would say that both > solutions are oke. The single difference is that the programmatic approach > (the way i have modified > the base test) will allow running the suite from within the IDE.
OK that's better if you want to run the test one by one - Thanks ! > > ./alex > -- > .w( the_mindstorm )p. > > #: Christophe Lombart changed the world a bit at a time by saying (astral > date: 2/2/2006 9:35 PM) :# > > For unit test, the custom node type file solution is quite easy. > > of course, for real applications I see good reasons to use the API to > > import the node types. > > > > How is it working for the unit tests ? (see the maven.xml, it is > > quite simple to understand) : > > > > 1/ Node types used in the unit tests are added in : > > /src/test-config/repository/repository/nodetypes/custom_nodetypes.xml > > > > 2/ target/repository contains the repository for the unit test and can > > clean up with " maven clean" . > > > > 3/ before starting the unit tests, > > /src/test-config/repository/repository/nodetypes/custom_nodetypes.xml > > is copied into target/repository/repository/nodetypes > > > > > > of course, we have the same result by using the API but I didn't know > > that Oliver has finished that. Up to you to choose what you want. > > > > > > > > On 2/2/06, Oliver Kiessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > That's how I have modified the BaseTest to do ;-). Register the custom > >> > node types using Jackrabbit > >> > API (before Christophe explaining how it works with Maven). > >> > >> sorry about that! I didn't know... Well, both ways are possible but I > >> prefer solving this programmatically.... ;) > >> > >> - oliver > >> > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > Christophe > > > > -- Best regards, Christophe
