Hi, I'm working in a project that uses j2, we plan to keep using it in the near future and we'd like to use the cms features described in graffito's web page. I browsed the sources and I have the same doubt that started this thread.
I don't understand what's the purpose of the webdav\filesystem\ojb servers. I think one of the purposes of jcr is to provide that layer on top of existing repositories. Moreover, most of the services the graffito api provides seem overlapped with jcr. My understanding is that most CMS features belong to a layer on top of jcr. Is there any reason for not using jcr as the only api to interact with the repository and build services on top of it? In any case, if there's the intention of building a repository that works as a hub of plugged server implementations, why not to build that integration layer as a JCR implementation leaving the CMS unaware of that?. thanks in advance, edgar
