On 9/1/06, Christophe Lombart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with you that GFT api is much simpler from a developer > perspective, however it's not as feature rich as jcr, and I'd prefer > the CMS to focus on providing generic features for any content rather > than providing less features for a fixed set of types. > I think it is possible to have generic features. The workflow will be a good exemple. It will be possible to define a specific workflow process for any kind of content. Please, give us some examples. what kind of generic features are you thinking about ?
sorry I wasn't clear, I had no specific feature in mind, I meant generic because it would work on top of a standard api, against content generated through the CMS or through other apps that need no knowledge of a custom api. br, edgar
