[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-103?page=all ]

Christophe Lombart reassigned GRFT-103:
---------------------------------------

    Assignee: Christophe Lombart

> AtomicTypeConversion on retrieve omitted (fails) when NodeTypePerHierarchy && 
> Discriminator
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GRFT-103
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-103
>             Project: Graffito
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JCR-Mapping
>            Reporter: Dan Connelly
>         Assigned To: Christophe Lombart
>            Priority: Critical
>
> ObjectConverterImpl#retrieveSimpleFields has this guard for one branch of its 
> logic: for populating the retrieved object:
>      if (classDescriptor.usesNodeTypePerHierarchyStrategy() && 
> classDescriptor.hasDiscriminator()) 
> When this test is true, then there is *no type conversion* on fields.  The 
> code attempts to set object field directly from the string, 
> getValue().getString(), value for the node property.   This fails for an 
> "int" field mapped from the object. 
> If I force this test the *false*, then the retrieve works and there is no 
> failure.
> While it is not entirely clear to me how the inheritance maaping strategy is 
> chosen or how it is implemented, it does not seem reasonable that the 
> strategy selection should affect field conversions.
> In my code, the same mapping file is used for the write and the read whatever 
> variations in mapping I choose.
> One variation I have tried is to remove all extend="xxxx" class attributes in 
> the mapping.   However, he inheritance strategy remained at 
> NodeTypePerHiearchy and the retrieve continued to fail.  
> BTW: The DTD comment says "extends" but the !ATTLIST requires it to be 
> "extend".  Confusing.    Since "extend" is optional and not ambiguous, why 
> would I ever want to provide it in the mapping?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to